Want to compare two towns side by side?

Compare

Burnopfield vs Easington Lane

Which is better to live in? Distance: 13.6 miles apart.

Share this comparisonWhatsAppXFacebookEmail

The verdict

Easington Lane is the more affordable option, with average house prices around 80% lower. Burnopfield has the lower crime rate of the two. For families, Burnopfield edges ahead on school quality.

Avg House Price

Burnopfield

£191,306

Easington Lane

£106,483

Crime Rate

Burnopfield

89.4

Easington Lane

94.5

Top-Two School Inspection Bands

Burnopfield

100.0%

Easington Lane

100.0%

Avg Download Speed

Burnopfield

295.5

Easington Lane

459.7

EPC Rating

Burnopfield

71

Easington Lane

72.4

Median Income

Burnopfield

£27,952

Easington Lane

£28,343

Property in Burnopfield commands an average of £191,306, compared with £106,483 in Easington Lane – a difference of 80%. The most affordable entry point in Burnopfield is a flat at £81,000, while in Easington Lane it is a flat at £15,000.

Average Price by Property Type (2025)

Biggest gap: flat homes are 440% pricier in Burnopfield (£81,000 vs £15,000).

Price Trend (11 Years)

Over the last 9 years, Burnopfield prices grew faster — 37% vs -17%.

Burnopfield has a crime rate of 89.4 per 1,000 residents, which is 6% lower than Easington Lane at 94.5 per 1,000. The most common crime category in Burnopfield is violent-crime, while in Easington Lane it is violent-crime.

Crime Rate by Category (per 1,000 residents)

Both towns share the same top crime category: violent crime.

Families may prefer Burnopfield, where 100% of schools are in the top two inspection bands versus 100% in Easington Lane. There are 1 schools in Burnopfield and 1 in Easington Lane.

Burnopfield School Inspection Breakdown

100% of 1 school (1 primary) sit in the top two inspection bands.

Easington Lane School Inspection Breakdown

100% of 1 school (1 primary) sit in the top two inspection bands.

MetricBurnopfieldEasington Lane
Total Schools11
Primary11
Secondary00
% Top two bands100%100%

Broadband & Connectivity

Average broadband speeds are 459.7 Mbps in Easington Lane and 295.5 Mbps in Burnopfield. Superfast coverage (30 Mbps+) reaches 92.7% of premises in Burnopfield and 97% in Easington Lane. Gigabit availability stands at 52.3% in Burnopfield and 90.1% in Easington Lane.

Easington Lane is the faster of the two by 56% on average download speed (460 vs 296 Mbps).

Energy Efficiency & Running Costs

Easington Lane leads on energy efficiency with an average EPC score of 72.4 (C), while Burnopfield averages 71 (C). Estimated annual energy costs average £1,147 in Burnopfield and £1,124 in Easington Lane. 66.6% of homes in Burnopfield have an EPC rating of C or above, compared to 71.4% in Easington Lane.

Easington Lane has more energy-efficient housing — 71.4% reach band C or above, vs 66.6% in the other.

Demographics & Economy

Median household income is £28,342.5 in Easington Lane and £27,952 in Burnopfield. The median age is 44.5 in Burnopfield and 44.5 in Easington Lane. Owner-occupancy is 60.2% in Burnopfield versus 60.3% in Easington Lane. Employment rates stand at 52.7% in Burnopfield and 51.5% in Easington Lane.

IndicatorBurnopfieldEasington Lane
Population3,7694,170
Median Age44.544.5
Median Household Income£27,952£28,342.5
Employment Rate52.7%51.5%
Owner Occupied60.2%60.3%
Degree-Level Qualified27.4%25.6%

Location

Loading map...

Common questions

Frequently asked questions

How far apart are Burnopfield and Easington Lane?
Burnopfield and Easington Lane are approximately 13.6 miles apart as the crow flies.
Which is cheaper to buy a house in, Burnopfield or Easington Lane?
Easington Lane is cheaper, with an average house price of £106,483.
Is Burnopfield or Easington Lane safer?
Burnopfield has the lower crime rate at 89.4 per 1,000 residents.
Which has better schools, Burnopfield or Easington Lane?
Burnopfield has the higher share of schools in the top two inspection bands at 100%.
Which has faster broadband, Burnopfield or Easington Lane?
Easington Lane has faster average broadband at 459.7 Mbps.

Keep exploring

Related comparisons